Saturday, July 25, 2009
SU Poster Session
IST 511 Reflection Day 5
While IST 511 has come to a close our careers are just beginning. As I reflect on my time at SU I had two epiphanies. First, I reaffirmed my goal to be a school library media specialist. I have big plans to integrate technology into our childrens' education and collaborate with teachers. Schools are the desired venue for this change agent. Schools will be my niche; librarianship is where I belong. This leads me to my second discovery: I am so proud to be part of such an accepting, honorable and diverse group of individuals that serves as the foundation for our intellectual freedom. Our nation is blessed to have advocates of this caliber who share so much of their time, intellect, and values. It is with great anticipation that I may carry this torch forward.
Many thanks to Scott Nicholson, Tasha Cooper, Blythe Bennett and the rest of the
Spring,
Kate
Thursday, July 23, 2009
IST 511 Reflection Day 4
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
IST 511 Reflection Day 2
Monday, July 20, 2009
IST 511 Reflection Day 1
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Syracuse University IST 601 Reflection
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Readers Response: Schultz-Jones, B. (2009). Collaboration in the school social network
The study followed 5 school library media specialists (SLMSs) with a range of practical experience and from varied districts who voluntarily documented their collaborative relationships with classroom teachers and administrators. The SLMSs classified their relationships according to 6 collaborative levels along an interaction continuum: “no interaction, exchanging information informally, providing books/resources when requested, consulting on course content, providing course materials, and designing a unit of study and presenting this unit together with a teacher or administrator” (Schultz-Jones, 2009).
Schultz-Jones then graphed and labeled the relationships. The result is a “webbed” illustration that documents the various subjects the SLMS interacted with and on what level of the continuum. Those plotted closest to the center (represented by the SLMS) are reflective of the highest level of collaboration – “designing a unit of study and co-presenting this material” (Schultz-Jones, 2009); those farthest away from the center represent those with no to low-level collaboration.
Through deductive analysis the data revealed 4 emergent themes referred to as “Social capital”, “Who’s your Fave 5”, “Strategic groups”, and “Professional learning communities” (Schultz-Jones, 2009). The first of these refers to the universal sentiment among the 5 SLMSs that social networks are a highly valued resource despite the investment of “time and effort…sometimes those efforts yield few results” (Schultz-Jones, 2009). The second emergent theme refers to effective collaborative relationships and how they are not necessarily those that are an SLMS’s 5 “favorite” informal friends, but those relationships where both parties have an agreed interest to engage and work efficiently together in the interest of their students. Thirdly, the study dismissed the assumption that existed at the onset, that is; that certain disciplines are more interested in collaborating than others. This was deduced from the data which, when plotted, showed various subjects in close proximity to the SLMSs. As a result, SLMSs are encouraged to look for those teachers who are willing to engage in high-level collaborative projects rather than target subject groups. Lastly, the data revealed the importance of demonstrating life-long learning traits and how the richness of your learning community can impact successful collaboration.
Schultz-Jones believes that “visualizing the school learning environment as a set of social networks provides the SLMSs with a way to map interactions and think strategically about building relationships”. Once these foundations are laid, SLMSs can then capitalize on their life-long learning communities to truly impact the academic experience of their students for the better.
Schultz-Jones, B. (2009). Collaboration in the school social network. Knowledge Quest, 37(4), 20-25.
Small, R. (2002). Collaboration: Where Does It Begin? Teacher Librarian (29)5, 8-11.
The portable MLIS : insights from the experts / edited by Ken Haycock and Brooke E. Sheldon. Chapter 15 Reflection
Monday, July 13, 2009
The portable MLIS : insights from the experts / edited by Ken Haycock and Brooke E. Sheldon. Chapter 14 Reflection
So here we are on Chapter 14 of The Portable MLIS titled Reader Advisory Services: How to help Users Find a "Good Book" authored by Mary K. Chelton, Professor at Queens College Graduate School of Library and Information Studies. My experience with book clubs, which fall under the RA umbrella, is limited. I was part of one when our kids were younger and sleep was at a premium. I found it difficult to keep up with the readings so I graciously bowed out. Aside from my inability to keep up, the discussions often switched gears from reading to parenting. Tangents that were perhaps welcome at the time, but distracting to the purpose of a book club.
The concept of a book club being a facilitated through the library is unfamiliar to me. I love this idea. Our village library was, up until 3 years ago, run under a regime of sorts that was built on “shushing” and overdue fines to fund its budgetary requirements. Our new librarian is excellent. While she has changed the culture and pioneered a new structure over her short tenure with us, she has focused most of her RA intentions on noninteractive services. That said, she has this on her list of to-dos this coming year. The most appealing notion of a book club organized through the library is that it is at a neutral facility - void of distractions – and that the facilitator could be a trained individual. Aside from that you don’t have to know someone to be part of it.
Chelton, Mary, K., (2008). Reader Advisory Services: How to help Users Find a "Good Book" . In K. Haycock & B. Sheldon (Eds.), The Portable MLIS (pp. 159-167).
Notes for personal future reference: Joyce Saricks (fiction), Neal Wyatt (non-fiction) intrinsic characteristics, www.bookletters.com, www.nextreads.com
Saturday, July 11, 2009
Reflection on The portable MLIS : insights from the experts / edited by Ken Haycock and Brooke E. Sheldon. / Chapeter 11
In my family I assumed the roles of bill payer, budget creator, checkbook manager, and paperwork filer so that I can later access it as our "accountant". You can imagine what worked for us 5-10 years ago is no longer. We've moved our computer to the kitchen in light of our children's online usage and the rise of e-statements and online banking has streamlined my once cumbersome filing system. I mention this victory because I still struggle with my closet! If only it could look like the catalogs that grace my doorstep.
Despite this victory my husband doesn't know the intricacies of my storage and retrieval system. This is where Chapter 11 takes hold. Once a system is shared, we need to collectively understand the indexing terms and how we could best query the system to locate the desired item.
As I shift gears and imagine the body of work that the Internet has access to - I can imagine the challenges that indexers are faced with when supplying results to queries with terms that hinge on context. Unlike Medline - a system with a defined body of work - the general nature of the Internet must be problematic. It will be my job as a library media specialist to educate children on the nuances. For instance, when searching for a seasonal image in Flickr the Boolean search allows us to specify an image that may be tagged with "fall or autumn". This would minimize the occurrence of photographs of water falls, for instance, and increase the occurrence of accurate hits with "autumn" lending context.
The issue I fear are the items that may not be located just because a tag or indexible matter is inaccurately indexed. Specifically, Weedman shares the example from the book looks at the works of "Nancy Van House" (Weedman, 2008). We can see that the various systems are compromised by various unofficial spellings of her name. While the Internet may give one presumably broader access, in this instance, the unknowing questioner's knowledge base may be compromised as well.
Spring,
Kate
References:
Weedman, J. (2008). Information retrieval: Designing, querying, and evaluating information systems. In K. Haycock & B. Sheldon (Eds.), The Portable MLIS (pp. 112- 126). Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Reflection on The portable MLIS : insights from the experts / edited by Ken Haycock and Brooke E. Sheldon. / Chapeter 9
Last semester I had a fieldwork assignment with an elementary school. One of my tasks was to perform a collection development of the classic fairy tale collection. I was ready to embrace change on this dated collection. Nonetheless, I wish I'd read Chapter 9 of The Portable MLIS written by G. Edward Evans prior to the project.
As I reflect on the process, I found myself hanging in the balance between executive decisions and thinking - who am I to tell these people what to order? I knew Cinderella and the like would be popular to many of the young girls, but thought it would be nice to have an Eastern European and Indian version to include the growing diversity of the district. For that matter, what would appeal to young boys? In addition, I wanted to know what the teachers needed. What materials were they using in class? What did their curriculum call for? Lastly, what did the other schools in the district offer in terms of depth and breadth and were they being circulated? G.E. Evans clearly summarized my sentiments in the four needs assessment areas; “normative, felt, expressed, and comparative needs” (2008, 88).
Scanning was critical to not only determine who was using this collection, but it also played into my process of scanning reviews to determine what would meet their needs. Ultimately, Evans’ regard for relationship building is, in my mind, a key component. While I didn’t deal with the vendor directly due to budget freezes, I found my communication with the LMS, teachers, and children was integral to develop a suggested list of wants through Titlewave.
Spring,
Kate
References
Haycock, K., & Sheldon, B. E. (2008). The portable MLIS : Insights from the experts. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
The portable MLIS : insights from the experts / edited by Ken Haycock and Brooke E. Sheldon.
1) Several missions of libraries were presented over their history. But what is the mission of the librarian?
Further in the chapter I came across the shared beliefs of librarians. Specifically, Rubin claims the "belief in intellectual freedom", "the public good", "education", and "value of the past: preservation", are beliefs essential to the success of a librarian's mission. (2008, 10-12) Lucky thing, I must be in the right discipline - I hold them near and dear as well.
2) Can libraries spur development of undeveloped countries?
Perhaps this is hypothetical. Is it possible to plant a library and watch a society grow? Or do libraries grow with society? I came across the Rubin's notion that "There is a forest (the society as a whole), as well as the trees (each individual library user). The beauty of libraries is that in serving the latter, the former is also served" (2008, 12). This is an interesting concept - one I'd like to explore further in our studies.
3) Finally I wrote; my fascination with libraries is their preservation of the past in the interest of furthering future knowledge.
Little did I know the chapter would close with a similar notion. "The librarian knows that the failure to maintain the past sets the present adrift, without context...ideas of the past must be part of the repertoire of knowledge to which everyone must have access" (2008, 13).
Tally-ho! Things are just starting to get exciting!
Spring,
Kate
References
Haycock, K., & Sheldon, B. E. (2008). The portable MLIS : Insights from the experts. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.